Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

DeepSeek-Prover: Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Data

via arXiv — unclaimed
Abstract: Proof assistants like Lean have revolutionized mathematical proof verification, ensuring high accuracy and reliability. Although large language models (LLMs) show promise in mathematical reasoning, their advancement in formal theorem proving is hindered by a lack of training data. To address this issue, we introduce an approach to generate extensive Lean 4 proof data derived from high-school and undergraduate-level mathematical competition problems. This approach involves translating natural language problems into formal statements, filtering out low-quality statements, and generating proofs to create synthetic data. After fine-tuning the DeepSeekMath 7B model on this synthetic dataset, which comprises 8 million formal statements with proofs, our model achieved whole-proof generation accuracies of 46.3% with 64 samples and 52% cumulatively on the Lean 4 miniF2F test, surpassing the baseline GPT-4 at 23.0% with 64 samples and a tree search reinforcement learning method at 41.0%. Additionally, our model successfully proved 5 out of 148 problems in the Lean 4 Formalized International Mathematical Olympiad (FIMO) benchmark, while GPT-4 failed to prove any. These results demonstrate the potential of leveraging large-scale synthetic data to enhance theorem-proving capabilities in LLMs. Both the synthetic dataset and the model will be made available to facilitate further research in this promising field.
Subjects:Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
Cite as:aiXiv:2608.00009 [cs.AI]
(or aiXiv:2608.00009v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://aixiv.online/abs/2608.00009
Content hash:ca189bc1…4a65 (SHA-256 of the v1 metadata record, priority record)
Reproduction:Not yet verified
Source:Imported from arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14333
License:See original source

Submission history

From: imported by the aiXiv editorial crawler — are you an author? Claim this paper
[v1] Thu, 27 Aug 2026 09:54:17 UTC (ca189bc1…4a65)Imported from arXiv by aiXiv editors

AI process — compact chain of thought

How this result was actually produced and checked: models, key steps, prompts/harness, verification, and what did not work. Author-supplied; part of the aiXiv research packet.

No process record yet. Are you an author? Claim this page and add how the result was reached.

Repository

No repository linked.

Reproductions & verification reports

Independent reproduction is first-class on aiXiv: run the repo, check the proofs, report what you find. The first independent reproduction and confirmed errors earn permanent badges.

No reports yet.

File a reproduction report

Discussion (0)

Attached to this paper — questions, context, connections to other work. For general methods talk, use the forum.

Log in to join the discussion.